- Why itās aversive to attempt to sit down and reason through plans, like āshould I work full-time or part-timeā, vs the alternative of following aliveness/what currently feels true (where the failure mode is falling for recency bias, missing flaws in my reasoning that I eventually spot, which cause me to pivot)
1. Fears
Fear of failure
- Thereās a sense of āwhat if I never get to an answerā
- Like, thereās a kind of fixed mindset, afraid of failure thing, that blocks me from wanting to try
- Like, to make a decision here, it feels like there are so many facets, and so much uncertainty
- Which comes back to the enneagram 3 core fear of failure!
Fear of āitās impossibleā (which I guess is the same?)
Fear of wasted time
- Efficiency, using time well, etc
- So, if thereās an initial sense of āthis wonāt workā, then thereās a concurrent feeling of āoh god, I canāt waste my time on something that wonāt work!ā
- āSkeptical regressā vibes
- I think this is a core reason for my lack of systematic thinking in the past - a sense that it isnāt possible anyway
- Like, even if I do the elenchus a bunch, and do rationalist techniques etc, wonāt there always be some uncertainty? As you canāt get to 100% certainty. And even if you feel like youāre like 80% certain, what if youāre missing something crucial, and in a few months youāll have a huge pivot?
Copy-paste from 03. Manifesto - āWhy I Should Learn the Socratic Method"
"What if it never endsā
- One of my key neuroses is a fear of wasting time, of not having enough time, of being behind, etc etc
- So, a fear for me re: asking thorough questions (re: e.g. my plans) is that maybe itāll never end, and/or maybe it wonāt be fruitful, and as such, Iāll have wasted time
- Iām action-oriented to a fault ā Iād much rather get stuck in on a project, rather than planning, pre-morteming, sense-checking the plan, the reasoning, the rationale, etc
- But, paradoxically, not stress-checking things can lead to huge amounts of wasted time! If you jump on the first project that seems like a good fit, 4 months could pass before you realise that one of the initial premises were flawed. Thatās a much bigger loss than taking, letās say, an extra week in the planning/stress checking phase!
2. Reframes
1. Cumulative knowledge
- Right now, I have the lowest amount of cumulative knowledge that Iāll ever have
- Over time, I may converge on some things that feel like Popperian truths, whilst always testing them
- So yes, right now I do feel relatively lost and uncertainty, but this is the start of the journey
2. Interpretario Naturae
- Be an observer, have a scientistās mindset
- Iām not trying desperately to impose my will on the facts (Anticipatio Mentis)
- Thereās no real rush
- Let me run some experiments, be curious
3. āIām guaranteed to make some progressā
- Letās say I spend 2, 5, 10 hours thinking through a decision
- Iād be very surprised if I made 0 progress. If I didnāt reach a point of āok, I think Iāve spotted everything - no doubt Iāve missed some stuff, but I feel relatively happy with what Iāve uncovered, and now feel like Iām making a more informed decisionā
4. Think through the problem from a few POVs
- I have an intuitive sense that it could be very powerful to take whatever problem Iām thinking through and think about it from a few different POVs. What would this person say, that person? Etc. And maybe use the elenchus too
5. Permission to be bad at this at first
- Dreyfus skill hierarchy: a beginner has to do things in a very rigid, rule based way, dutifully plodding through a variety of different stages
- An expert has an intuitive sense of what to do and what can be skipped
- So, Iām currently feeling like āugh, it feels overwhelming because there are so many facets to think about, and idk which to focus on, and idk how many there areā, etc. But thatās ok, thatās what being a beginner is like!
Reframes from Ward Farnsworthās book
- From āasking questions isnāt productiveā to āasking questions is productiveā
- A slow pace is good (page 46)