- A week or so I put the âSimply The Seenâ guide into Gemini and had it guide me through the steps
- I pinned that conversation to make it easy to come back to đ
Gemini
bah, i got distracted, coming back to this a day later! can we start again?
I tweeted this today:
"oh yeah I think I've weakened the 4th and 5th fetters" said the guy who gets pissed off 100 times a day"
Of course. Welcome back! Distractions are part of the path. Letâs start again with fresh eyes.
Thatâs a brilliant and very honest tweet. It points directly to one of the most important and often misunderstood aspects of this process: the experience of âechoesâ and âdoubtâ after a breakthrough.
What youâre describing is not a sign that your previous work was undone or that nothing happened. In fact, itâs a well-documented stage of weakening these particular fetters. The provided Fetters 4&5 Guide
speaks directly to this:
-
Reactions are expected to return: The guide offers some crucial expectation management: âIf these two fetters are just weakened, there may be the expectation that the push and pull wonât even start up any more. It will!â.
-
Doubt is normal: âOne of the primary things to deal with here may be doubtâ. Your tweet is a perfect expression of this doubt.
-
âWeakeningâ has a specific meaning: âWeakening these fetters means the reactions still come up, perhaps over and over again, but donât overwhelmâ. The goal is not the immediate absence of anger, but a change in its power and duration.
-
Echoes of old habits: The guide notes that even after seeing through the illusion, âHabitual reactive patterns⊠can create huge echoesâ. It can seem like reactions are starting up âwhen itâs really just being in a situation where reactions always DID start upâ.
So, your experience of getting âpissed offâ doesnât invalidate your progress; it gives you the perfect opportunity to deepen it. Letâs use this as our new material.
From the â100 times a dayâ you got pissed off, can you pick one specific, recent example?
We are back at the beginning.
Step 1: Start with the Story
What is one specific story of you getting pissed off?
Summary of what we did
Of course. Here is a short summary of the two fetter weakening cycles we worked through today.
Summary of Todayâs Inquiry
Today, you successfully applied the 12-step inquiry process to weaken both an aversion and a craving, which correspond to the 4th and 5th fetters (ill will and desire).
Cycle 1: Weakening Aversion
-
The Trigger: You began with a âmicro-exampleâ of being âpissed offâ by a cleaner dragging chairs loudly in a hospital cafeteria.
-
The Factual Sentence: We distilled this story into the simple, observable fact: âThe cafeteria is not quietâ.
-
The Inquiry: You identified the âfirst dartâ as a âconstricted, anxious feelingâ in your sternum, which you rated as a subtle 1/10 in intensity.
-
The Result: After looking for the âbuttonâ or reason to react, the sensation dissolved, and you were left with a âvery subtle feeling of happiness or pleasantness at realising how the [first] dart has dissolved and the second dart was an illusionâ.
Cycle 2: Weakening Craving
-
The Trigger: You chose to work on a strong, âactiveâ craving to check social media for validation on a piece of writing you had shared.
-
The Factual Sentence: This was refined into the specific, unmet desire: âMy friend has not replied to say that Iâm a great writerâ.
-
The Inquiry: You described the âfirst dartâ of craving as a 2/10 âpulling feeling from my chest,â like a âblack hole feeling, with its own gravityâ. Following your own insightful question, you engaged in a dedicated, prolonged search for the âbuttonâ compelling this craving and confirmed you could not find one.
-
The Result: The craving collapsed into a âsimple, neutral fact,â replaced by a âsubtle feeling of excitement/joyâ at the realisation that you can actively dissolve cravings and aversions.
In both cycles, you followed the core principle of the guides: isolating a factual trigger, directly experiencing the associated âfirst dartâ sensation, and seeing through the illusory âsecond dartâ of reactivity by finding no inherent reason or âbuttonâ for it in your direct experience.