• 2025-07-22
  • When I was ~8, my parents adopted a ~6 year old girl, and it didn’t go particularly well (wrote a substack about it here)
    • (Up until today, I thought I was 6 and she was 4 - just checked with my sister and she had more accurate dates (she has the paperwork))
  • Yesterday, the family therapist I met with was like “yeah, it’s only in the last ~10 years that the government was properly offered support to families who go through with adoption”.
    • Learning about the systemic & policy factors at play in our story will be very destigmatising I think.
    • Great "systems view" rather than a cause-and-effect “my parents just massively fucked up” view
    • So, learning about this feels very very useful!
  • Just ran these reports via Gemini Deep Research
  1. please tell me about child adoption in the UK from the 1990s onwards. I want to know about different eras, e.g., I have been told that in the last 10 years, the government has become much more proactive about offering families who go through adoption therapy. I want to know about things like success/failure rates, common issues, etc
  2. please make a report about adoption in the uk in the present day, how it is framed, what support is offered, etc
  3. please create a report about borderline personality disorder

Initial flashcards

In the 1990s, 
what was the major political concern 
regarding children in the UK care system 
that led to a policy drive to increase adoptions
{{c1::The problem of "drift in care", 
where children languished for years in multiple temporary placements}}
|
What was the "dangerous disconnect" 
in UK adoption policy during the 1990s and early 2000s?
{{c1::Policy aggressively pushed for more adoptions of children with complex trauma, 
while professional understanding of trauma's neurobiological impact 
was still in its infancy}}
|
What landmark 1990s study on childhood trauma 
took years to filter into frontline social work practice
{{c1::The Adverse Childhood Experiences (ACEs) study}}
|
Before the 2000s, 
what was the main focus of adoption practice in the UK
{{c1::Providing healthy infants for infertile couples}}
|
There a shift in UK adopt in the ~1990s
From
{{c1::providing infants}}
to 
{{c1::finding homes for children in the care system}}
|
What caused the shift in UK adoption in the ~1990s
from providing infants to finding homes for children in the care system
{{c1::A sharp fall in the number of healthy infants 
voluntarily relinquished for adoption, 
due to factors like 
available birth control 
and reduced stigma of unmarried motherhood}}
|
What significant change 
did the Adoption and Children Act 2002 make 
regarding the eligibility of adopters
{{c1::It formally allowed unmarried 
and same-sex couples 
to adopt jointly 
for the first time}}
|
What crucial statutory right 
did the Adoption and Children Act 2002 grant to adoptive families 
for the first time
{{c1::The right to request an assessment of their support needs at any time post-adoption}}
|
For over a decade after the 2002 Act, 
why was the right to a support needs assessment 
often considered a "hollow right"?
{{c1::Because the Act created the right to an assessment 
but did not provide a dedicated budget 
to fund the specialist services that were often recommended}}
|
What is the single greatest difference 
in the support landscape for adoptive families today 
compared to the 1990s/2000s?
{{c1::The existence of the Adoption and Special Guardianship Support Fund (ASGSF) 
to pay for therapeutic services}}
|
What is the purpose of the Adoption and Special Guardianship Support Fund (ASGSF)
{{c1::To provide dedicated government funding 
to local authorities 
to pay for essential therapeutic services 
for eligible adopted and special guardianship children}}
|
Re: adoption:
What is the difference between an adoption "disruption" and an "breakdown"
{{c1::Disruption - when a placement ends before the final adoption order is granted 
Breakdown - when a placement ends post-adoption order}}
|
What is the estimated rate of adoption disruption or breakdown in the UK
{{c1::Between 3% and 9%}}
|
What are the two key risk factors 
that dramatically increase the likelihood of an adoption breaking down
{{c1::
1 - The child being placed for adoption after the age of four
2 - A pre-adoption history of witnessing domestic violence or experiencing sexual abuse}}
|
A 2024 report on adoption disruptions 
concluded the primary cause was 
{{c1::a systemic failure of communication 
and knowledge gaps 
between 
the adopters, 
the professionals (social workers), 
and the foster carers}}
|
A landmark 2024 report, 
"{{c1::Pre-Adoption Order Disruptions in England}}" 
provided a forensic analysis of 77 disruption cases
|
The landmark 2024 report on adoption disruptions was by
{{c1::Adoption England}}
|
The 4 distinct "manifestations of failure" outlined in the "adoption disruptions" 2024 report
{{c1::Not Said
Not Heard}}
{{c2::Not Known
Not Challenged}}
|
The 4 distinct "manifestations of failure" outlined in the "adoption disruptions" 2024 report
{{c1::Not Said
Not Heard}}
Not Known
Not Challenged}}
|
In the context of adoption "failure points", 
what does "{{c2::Not Said}}" refer to
{{c1::When adopters conceal the severity of their struggles 
due to fear, shame, or a desire not to be seen as a failure}}
|
What does the adoption "failure point" of "{{c2::Not Known}}" describe
{{c1::When critical information, 
such as the full extent of a child's trauma-related needs, 
was not properly assessed or communicated to adopters before placement}}
|
What is an example of the "{{c2::Not Heard}}" failure point in adoption practice?
{{c1::When professionals are overly optimistic 
about an adopter's capacity to cope, 
or when adopters fail to grasp the daily reality 
behind professional jargon used to describe trauma}}
|
In adoption practice, what does the "{{c2::Not Challenged}}" failure point refer to
{{c1::When red flags, 
like clashes in parenting styles between foster carers and adopters, 
are identified by professionals 
but are not addressed or mediated}}
|
What metaphor is used 
to describe the tangible, physiological changes in the brain and nervous system 
that children adopted from care carry with them
{{c1::An "invisible suitcase"}}
|
How does early life trauma 
typically affect the amygdala in a developing child's brain
{{c1::It can become overdeveloped and hyper-reactive, 
leaving the brain in a constant state of high alert (hypervigilance)}}
|
What is the function of the {{c2::prefrontal cortex}}, 
and how is its development impacted by early life trauma
{{c1::It is responsible for executive functions 
like emotional regulation and impulse control; 
trauma can disrupt its development, leaving it underdeveloped}}
|
What theory posits that 
the initial separation from the birth mother 
is a profound, pre-verbal trauma 
that imprints a fundamental sense of abandonment
{{c1::The theory of the "primal wound"}}
|
What is attachment trauma?
{{c1::A trauma that occurs 
when a primary caregiver is a source of fear, pain, or neglect, 
teaching the child that those who should protect 
them are dangerous or unavailable}}
|
BPD is characterised by (4 things)
{{c1::pervasive instability in 
moods, 
interpersonal relationships, 
self-image, 
and behaviour}}
|
What is considered the absolute core fear 
that drives the behaviours associated with BPD
{{c1::Frantic efforts to avoid real or imagined abandonment}}
|
In BPD
What is the term for 
the pattern of alternating between extremes of
{{c1::idealisation and devaluation in relationships}}?
{{c2::Unstable and intense interpersonal relationships}}
|
What is the critical link 
that connects the trauma of adoption 
to a heightened risk for developing BPD
{{c1::The core fear of abandonment in BPD 
directly mirrors the "primal wound" of abandonment 
experienced through relinquishment}}
|
According to the biosocial model, 
what two factors interact to cause the development of BPD
{{c1::An interaction between a biological or genetic vulnerability 
and a chronically invalidating environment in childhood}}
|
Why can a child develop BPD 
even within a loving and secure adoptive home
{{c1::Because the external reality of a loving home 
does not erase the child's internal reality 
and pre-existing neurological wounds 
from early trauma}}
|
There is a significant and controversial overlap in symptoms between 
BPD and {{c1::cPTSD}}
|
What was the nature of post-adoption "support" 
typically offered by the state in the UK during the 1990s
{{c1::It was minimal 
and largely revolved around access to birth records 
or intermediary services for letterbox contact, 
not therapeutic support}}

Filling in the gaps from the above

  • Reviewing the above, and making new flashcards as needed

ACES

What does the acronym ACE stand for in the context of the landmark public health study
{{c1::Adverse Childhood Experiences}}
|
What year was the ACE study published
{{c1::1998}}
|
The ACE Study established 
{{c1::a dose-response relationship}}
between 
{{c2::the number of ACEs}}
and 
{{c2::the risk of negative adult outcomes}}
|
What core idea does the "dose-response" finding 
from the ACE Study demonstrate
{{c1::The more ACEs an individual has, 
the higher their risk for negative health outcomes}}
|
The ACE survey grouped ten types of childhood adversity 
into what three main categories
{{c1::Abuse, 
Neglect, 
and Household Dysfunction}}
|
List the five types 
of household dysfunction 
measured by the ACE Study
{{c1::Parental separation
Domestic violence 
Substance misuse 
Mental illness 
Incarcerated household member}}
|
What was the most revolutionary aspect of the ACE Study's findings 
{{c1::It linked childhood adversity 
directly to long-term physical illnesses 
and leading causes of death, 
not just mental health issues}}
|
The ACE Study helped to explain 
the biological pathway from childhood adversity to adult illness 
by popularising what concept?
{{c1::Chronic, toxic stress}}
|
What is the primary mechanism 
by which toxic stress 
is thought to cause long-term health problems
{{c1::By disrupting healthy brain development 
and dysregulating the nervous, endocrine, and immune systems}}
|
Approx n of participants in the original ACE Study
{{c1::Over 17,000}}
|
The population studied in the original ACE Study 
was primarily from what demographic group
{{c1::White, middle-class, educated individuals 
with health insurance}}
|
Why was the demographic makeup of the original ACE Study's participants 
so significant for its findings
{{c1::It showed that ACEs were a widespread public health issue, 
not confined to marginalised or "at-risk" populations}}
|
According to the original ACE Study, 
what % of participants 
reported at least one ACE?
{{c1::~66%}}
|
According to the original ACE Study, 
what % of participants 
reported four or more ACEs
{{c1::~16%}}
|
The ACE Study moved the understanding of childhood trauma 
from a {{c1::purely psychological}} issue 
to a {{c1::public health}} issue
|
How an ACE score is calculated:
{{c1::By asking a person to answer "yes" or "no" 
to ten specific questions about their childhood
Each "yes" answer adds one point to their score, 
for a possible total ranging from 0 to 10}}
|
A person with an ACE score of {{c1::4}} or more 
Has a significantly increased risk of attempting suicide 
by what factor compared to someone with a score of 0
{{c1::12-fold increased risk}}