Main Body

  • In Being Kegan 4 is dumb, 2026-01-31, I explored a useful visualisation/pointer given by a mentor, re: unscrunching from your Kegan 4 worldview/key axioms that you might be scrunched with in the moment
  • E.g., something like ā€œwe have to do it this way!!!ā€ re: a work project, which makes you rush something through without getting insights from others, because you’re possessed by the notion that the thing is Definitely A Problem that you need to fix ASAP (vs if you unscrunched, you’d realise that it’s one of a thousand possible problems, etc)
  • I found the visual of the massively multidimensional object of preference spectrums, and the word ā€œunscrunchingā€ as a direct pointer for the mental/physical move of stepping back and dropping the current obsession/focus/axiom-and-the-implications-of-the-axiom really useful, and it’s been on my mind since (and used occasionally)
  • However, I didn’t grok the real insight, and how it connects to other things that I have known
  • Really, unscrunching is a direct, meta/macro-pointer back to Deep Okayness, Brahman, the perfection of ultimate reality

I was Deeply Okay, briefly

  • As I wrote about in ā€œConsensus-ism part 2ā€ - I had a Kensho experience in Feb 2024 (2 years ago now, wow).
  • This involved ā€œforegrounding the backgroundā€, foregrounding awareness/layer 1, which led to permanent shifts including the ability to be Deeply Okay because you’ve seen experientially that there’s this untouchable awareness that is you and is always holding you etc
  • This led to realising (and involved the experience of): ā€œholy shit, everything is perfect how it is, my striving exists in level 2, there’s nothing I need to Do, I am Deeply Okayā€

But I don’t abide in Deep Okayness

  • Looking at how Sasha describes it in his post:
    • Greater feelings of immersion in the world, sense of the sublime beauty of existence
    • Greater affection for other people, directly connected to less worrying about what they think of me
    • Less worrying about what type of shithead I am for not getting things done, more getting things done
    • Less guilt, more skillful action to repair things done wrong in the past
    • Easier time reaching deep meditative states, due to massive decrease in inner conflict
    • Everything more pleasant
  • The kensho/stream entry experience shifted me massively in this direction, for absolute sure. There was a huge and permanent ā€œbefore-and-afterā€
  • But, I think the thing that interferes is your conditioning. So, I can experience all of the above, and often do, but I still have a giant pile of conditioning (Technical debt) to work through, and that I’ve been working through, in my haphazard way

Conditioning that keeps me out of Deep Okayness

  1. There’s somewhere to reach (ā€œOut-There-ismā€) (the big one)
  2. Intellectualisation, conceptualisation
  3. Left-hemisphere capture
  4. Discomfort being around people
  5. Judgementalness

Out-There-Ism

  • This is the big one!
  • Most recently for me, this looked like ā€œoh shit, what I need to do is meditate for 3+ hours a day to get to access concentration, so that I can experience the shamatha jhanas to make my concentration really strong, so that I can do insight meditation and see through the fetters/become enlightened and stop being deluded and confusedā€
  • This is pretty compelling, and would no doubt work. But, it’s an instance of ā€œOut-There-ismā€ (which I coined in the shower yesterday). The implicit belief is ā€œand then I can relax/be happyā€.
  • Vs, what about dropping the whole thing (Unscrunching), and being ok now?
  • After all, the whole thing of enlightenment is a subtractive process. The whole ā€œthere’s nowhere to get toā€ thing. The whole ā€œyou have Buddha nature right nowā€ thing.
  • ā€œI can’t enjoy life/chill/relax/Do Nothing/do things that aren’t part of the Spiritual Path (e.g. dating) right now, because I need to prioritise meditating as much as I canā€.
  • But of course, even though I’m not permanently in the non-dual, Brahman-foregrounding state that I was in during kensho, the conclusion reached by seeing that state (there is a perfect untouched awareness/oneness and nothing needs fixing) still applies.
  • I don’t need to do anything. I don’t need to do xyz so that one day I can be ok. Okayness is my baseline state. I am deeply ok

Intellectualisation, conceptualisation

  • See the bit on the 2 thorns, below
  • But basically, becoming obsessed with conceptually grasping the thing, becoming obsessed with your philosophy of what happened, which actually just creates layers of bullshit on top of the thing which requires no concepts. It’s a subtractive thing and you’re adding shit on top of it.
  • This is also where Unscrunching and ā€œNeti netiā€ comes in. Whatever you’re identifying yourself with, you are not that. Stop it!
  • From Gemini:
    • Neti neti is a Sanskrit expression that translates to ā€œnot this, not thisā€ or ā€œneither this nor that.ā€ It is one of the oldest and most powerful analytical tools in Hindu philosophy (specifically the Upanishads and Advaita Vedanta). It is the ā€œsubtractiveā€ path to finding the Truth you were asking about—the process of peeling away everything that isn’t you until only the absolute remains.
    • The logic follows that if you keep saying ā€œnot thisā€ to everything you can perceive, you eventually run out of things to negate.
    • What is left is pure consciousness—the ā€œWitness.ā€ This ā€œleftoverā€ is what the texts call Brahman or Atman. It can’t be described with words because words are ā€œthings,ā€ and the Truth is the source of things.

The two thorns analogy of Advaita Vedanta

  • A mentor told me about this a few days ago
  • First thorn = ignorance, e.g. the belief that I’m in a Buddhist Nihilism Phase
  • Second thorn = knowledge, e.g. the realisation that actually no, it’s not true that things are meaningless because they can’t save me, it’s true that I don’t need saving/improving, so everything else is like, a bonus that I get to interact with
  • And then, you drop them both!!! You don’t cherish both thorns, think about them, hold them in place.
    • ā€œOnce you have realized the ultimate truth, you no longer need the concepts, words, or teachings that got you there.
    • ā€œCherishing the knowledge (becoming arrogant about being ā€œwiseā€) is just as much a binding attachment as ignorance itself.ā€
    • In the teachings of sages like Ramana Maharshi and Nisargadatta Maharaj, the point is that Truth isn’t a ā€œthingā€ you find or a new piece of information you acquire. Instead, Truth is what is already there, but it’s currently covered up by both your mistakes (ignorance) and your concepts about reality (knowledge).
    • 🚨 🚨 🚨
    • ā€œThe Truth is the reality that exists before you even start thinking or labeling yourself.ā€
    • 🚨 🚨 🚨
  • So, I experienced this state, ultimate reality. And then I went back to my conditioning, because of course, it’d be mad if I didn’t. There’s a Shamil Chandaria graph of the path where the x axis is waking up and the y axis is cleaning up your conditioning. I ā€œwoke upā€ somewhat but my pile of conditioning (Technical debt) remained, by bad habits remain. So, including Out-There-ism and intellectualisation, this also included:

Left-hemisphere capture

  • I’ve been super left-hemisphere captured. Always in problem-solving mode, collapsed awareness, ā€œdon’t talk to me whilst I make my coffee because I’m in a collapsed awareness state holding tension in my body because I’m in work modeā€
  • Always listening to podcasts over being with my own thoughts (for years). Etc.

Discomfort being around people

Judgementalness

  • I do a lot of ā€œI’m better than that person because xā€. ā€œOh shit, I wish I was like that person because yā€

Being trapped in Buddhist nihilism as a result of misunderstanding Deep Okayness

  1. Experience the Brahman-foregrounding, background-foregrounding state during kensho, and ā€œoh shit, wow, everything is perfect as it is, there’s nothing to do, I’m Deeply Okayā€
  2. Like a year later, shortly after a ā€œ2nd pathā€ experience where I experienced the kensho state again and could make much more sense of it: ā€œoh shit, this (access to deep okayness) means that nothing can hurt me, ultimatelyā€. Awesome sense of how this pure awareness can’t be harmed by anything that happens (e.g., I don’t need to be intimidated by people because they can’t hurt the pure awareness that exists)
  3. And then shortly after that, the opposite insight: ā€œoh shit, this means nothing can help me eitherā€.
  • And then, I failed to get this right, to see this correctly, incorrectly landing in nihilism. ā€œShit, nothing can help me, therefore there’s no point to anythingā€
  • Vs actually no, the point (and I only realised this a few days ago), is that nothing needs fixing. So yes, nothing will ā€œhelpā€, but that doesn’t mean things are useless or meaningless, just that help isn’t needed
  • Nihilism, Kensho, No Self, ā€œneeding to meditateā€
    • ā€œThings are dukkha (unsatisfying) and can’t help me, wahā€ → that’s ok because I don’t need help
    • ā€œI need to meditate for 3+ hours a day so that I can be saved at some point in the futureā€ → I don’t need to meditate for 3+ hours a day because I don’t need saving
    • Blending with ā€œI can’t be ok until I’ve gained x knowledge/experienceā€ → actually no, the way to be ok is to drop all of that, right now in this moment
  • See the two thorns analogy above

Conclusion

So where does this leave me?

  • I’m deeply okay right now. I don’t need concepts. I don’t need to explain myself. I don’t need to hold all of the above in my head, like a tangle of thorns, in an attempt to get me back to that state, one day.
  • ==ā€œThe Truth is the reality that exists before you even start thinking or labeling yourself.ā€==

And what about my conditioning?

  • I wonder if meditating could help with this. I clearly still have a huge amount of technical debt, and actually, the Technical debt analogy comes from Mark of meditationbook.page, so yeah, I imagine meditation would definitely help
  • But, with the rememberance that I don’t have to ā€œclear up enough technical debt so that I can be happy one dayā€. Happiness/okayness isn’t ā€œOut Thereā€ some time in the future.
  • (Another path for cleaning up conditioning is the ā€œintegrationā€ pillar that Romeo Stevens describes in ā€œthe threefold training)
  • And of course, morality, sila.
  • So there’s still lots to do to keep operating at higher levels, but I don’t have to do shit. If I want to clear out some technical debt, become more moral, kind, compassionate etc, then hell yeah, what an awesome extra thing that I get to do

Talking about this with people = cherishing the second thorn

  • Here’s an interesting nascent insight I’ve been vaguely approaching:
  • I talk about this stuff a lot. I live in a community, and when people ask me how I’m doing, what I’m up to, I often tell them about this stuff, about my new insights, the previous insights to give context, etc
  • This feels suboptimal for two reasons:
    1. It makes me very… one-note. This stuff feels the Most Important, so I don’t talk about more like, chill/fun things, it’s always Serious Talking Time where I explain my big Insights and their Implications. It’s also inherently hyper-personal, so may be illegible to others, totally about me, etc. And inherently hyper-self-centered, therefore.
    2. It’s the thing of cherishing the second thorn. ā€œI’m really excited about my new intellectualisation, new concepts, that help me understand my ignorance a bit better!ā€œ. It’s me holding both of the thorns in place, cherishing them
  • Really, if the point is to discard all the thorns, then talking about my thorns and intellectualisations is the exact opposite thing
  • I’ve made my whole life about this stuff, for years. It has meant that I have very little to talk about with my family, because they are hyper-removed from this stuff (and this is why tpot/post-rationalist people like hanging out, because they can talk about their journey re: the thorns that they’re collecting and cherishing, and be legible to each other, and hope that they might stumble across a thorn from another person which might be added to their own tangle of thorns in a way that feels useful)
  • Vs, if you drop all the thorns, what remains? What can you talk about then?
  • Maybe in this space, you can be playful, tuned into the other person, spontaneous, free.