Should I intentionally tweet better? 2025-10-24
Saw this tweet and thought I’d try out the app:
- bit.ly/xpersonality is the app, this is the tweet

My analysis from this app 2025-10-25

Note that it only pulls your 30 most recent tweets, so actually it kinda sucks, lol. Would be so good if it read them all (but understandable why it doesn’t)
My profile right now:

Posting Style:

@alexislearning’s tweets are highly introspective and conversational, blending personal anecdotes, emotional reflections, and light-hearted commentary.
They frequently post short, punchy insights (e.g., “I have uninstalled the people-pleasing desire to fill in any silence”) alongside longer threads or replies engaging with others’ ideas.
Emojis are used liberally for emphasis and warmth (e.g., “holy shit, excitedddd” or ”🥰🥰🥰”), giving a casual, approachable vibe.
They often link to personal writings or scrapbooks (e.g., on mythopoesis or circling), suggesting a reflective, journal-like approach to Twitter.
Engagement is community-focused: many replies critique or build on others’ posts (e.g., debating phone detox or codependency), and they host events like circling sessions.
Overall, the style is vulnerable yet confident, avoiding overly polished or performative content in favor of authentic, stream-of-consciousness sharing.

Interests:

The tweets revolve around personal development and relational psychology, with heavy emphasis on practices like meditation, circling (a form of authentic relating), Ideal Parent Figure (IPF) protocol, and emotional maturity (e.g., writing an “alternative life history” with emotionally mature parents or saying no to “pragmatic” job offers).
There’s clear overlap with online subcultures: direct references to Effective Altruism (EA) spaces like the “EA Hotel,” LessWrong (LW)-style rationalism, and “TPOT” (That Part of Twitter/postrationalists), including questions about TPOT’s gender imbalance.
Other topics include nutrition and lifestyle experiments (e.g., stability despite caffeine/sunlight changes), reading (Blood Meridian), music (Grimes), and critiques of modern life (e.g., phone addiction, codependency as “rubbish”).
Broader themes touch on attachment, community building, and spirituality (e.g., relational attunement, IPF sessions), but little on politics, mainstream media, or global causes.

Personality:

They come across as warm, self-aware, and growth-obsessed—a “cherisher” per their bio, prioritizing deep connections and emotional authenticity over external validation.
There’s a contrarian streak (e.g., rejecting job offers for “aliveness,” calling out recency bias in advice), blended with humor and irony (e.g., mocking early phone detox claims or self-deprecating as the “illegible tpot guy at the EA Hotel”).
Vulnerability shines through in admissions of inner conflict (e.g., tension between honoring experiences and feeling like a “dick” for not wanting to talk).
They’re optimistic and communal, excited about modalities like IPF (“PSYCHOACTIVE dude”) and eager to share relational “cheat codes” (e.g., accountability for gym habits).
Overall, they embody a post-rationalist ethos: intellectually curious but emotionally attuned, bridging analytical communities with vibey, felt-sense explorations.

Effective Altruism (EA): 45
- Alignment is moderate due to presence in EA spaces (e.g., hosting at the EA Hotel, newcomers talk with EA acronyms), but tweets focus on personal/relational growth rather than utilitarian causes like AI safety or global health. No evidence of longtermism or “doing the most good” framing; it’s more incidental community involvement.
LW-brand Rationality (LW): 55
- Some nods to rationalist concepts (e.g., counterfactuals, rationalism vs. TPOT), and awareness of LW community via slides/acronyms, but lacks deep dives into Bayesianism, biases, or decision theory. Content leans more experiential/emotional than analytical or sequence-style.
TPOT (Postrats): 85
- Strong fit with vibey, contrarian, irony-infused style (e.g., self-aware critiques, relational/spiritual experiments, direct TPOT discussions like gender balance). Engages online culture through aesthetics (e.g., Grimes, book emojis) and post-rational “felt sense” topics, positioning them as an active participant.
Normie: 25
- Touches everyday life (e.g., nutrition, phone use, reading popular books), but always through a niche, introspective lens—no mainstream politics, media, or conventional discourse. Subcultural references dominate, making it far from “normie” norms.

@alexislearning is a relational post-rationalist at heart: deeply invested in emotional and communal growth within EA/LW/TPOT-adjacent circles, but prioritizing authentic self-exploration over rigid ideology.
Their online presence feels like a digital therapy session crossed with community organizing—warm, witty, and unapologetically inward-focused, appealing to those seeking “vibes” with intellectual depth.

Scores
EA - 45
LW - 5555
TPOT - 85
NORMIE - 25

Graph (don’t really care about this)