0. The core claim

In any moment, you have access to all the information you need in order to make "the next right action"

  • Things (actions, thoughts, ideas) can feel one of two ways:

    1. Obvious, straightforward, transparently correct (Consonance (AKA consensus))
    2. Grind-y, off, bad (Dissonance)
  • If something feels transparently correct (that is, if there is consensus), go ahead and do it, until a feeling of off-ness appears, at which point, pause and reassess

  • If something feels grind-y and off, then it’s not the right thing to do - pause and reassess

  • This is uhh, kind of the whole thing?

  • Make decisions where:

    1. You know you’re making the right decision in that moment
    2. You’re doing what feels best
  • AKA, be in a Flow state, more and more reliably

1. You have access to all the data you need always

2. But we habitually distrust layer 1

  • People are accustomed to making themselves do things that feel grind-y and off
  • People think they have to do things that are grind-y and off. “If I only do things that feel good, then won’t I just like, play video-games all the time?”
  • That is, people are used to distrusting and disregarding Layer 1, and instead following their thoughts and abstractions from Layer 2

Core false beliefs

3. What goes wrong when you distrust your sense data

4. Alternative approach

Therefore, Flow state

  • The idea, really, is to be in a flow state where you honour your experience
  • If something feels bad, that’s perfect unfakeable signal that that thing is indeed bad to do right now, and there’s no need to force yourself to do it
  • It something feels transparently correct, then that’s perfect unfakeable signal that that thing is the correct thing to engage with right now

5. This is a much nicer way to live

6. Common pushbacks

Appendix