📝 Alex's scrapbook

Recent notes

First principles 1 - what have survived my pivots?

Apr 02, 202614 min read

What has survived your pivots? You could give me a chronological list of your major life phases and what you cared about in each, and I could help you spot what threads persist across all of them. The things that show up in every phase are your most reliable signal.

This should be pretty easy!

  • Obviously learning - since I was ~19, I’ve been super into learning and “self improvement”. I love growth for the sake of growth, it feels very profound to see how much I’ve changed. I love that shit
  • Obviously comedy - I love making people laugh, I love my comedy podcasts
  • Obviously
 love/women - I’m very much a lover
  • Obviously music, although it feels less of a thing these days. I do still feel thrilled when I find new albums I love (e.g., I’m really liking Wednesday and Snocaps atm). And I’ve been listening to a lot of D’Angelo recently
    • Some fiction too, David Foster Wallace mostly
  • Enneagram 3 - I really do love being useful, valuable, competent
  • What my astrology sheds light on, 2026-03-14

Gave Claude Code access to the codebase of this website

  • Had it read through all the folders and summarise
  • Note that it will only know about what I’ve written about, which is like, “stuff that I value, and that I’ve also wanted to write about”. So things like comedy, women, music, possibly other stuff, will be very underrepresented, vs e.g. intellectual stuff
  • I also imagine it’s going to have some details wrong, e.g. it thinks that I discovered EA after the biotech startup, but that’s fine
  • And then, I created the What my astrology sheds light on, 2026-03-14 page and the Misc Alvea feedback, 2023 page, and asked it to regenerate its answer. Below is the regenerated version

Your life phases and what you cared about

Eras 1–12: Childhood → uni → first job → girlfriend
Survival and escape. High-conflict household, retreating inward, being the sparkly golden son. Cared about: getting out, achieving, having one person to connect through.

Eras 13–14: Breakup, EA, Alvea, FTX collapse
Your superpowers emerged before you had language for them. Ethan hired you for knowledge management; within weeks you’d redesigned Slack norms, crystallised culture concepts into visual notes, run company-wide interviews synthesised by theme, and experimented with half a dozen tools — all self-directed. Ethan: “He had very little direction from me in what he should work on, rather deciding on projects based on his own sense of what would move the needle.” Rob: you “streamlined tons of operational processes” and “made it a priority for the entire company to still work on professional growth.” The earlier manager: “You blew my mind a few times with our early collaborations” and “telling people about how internal ops is changing & improving, realising this is pretty much a story about Alex.”

Era 15: Asia — the turning point
Vipassana, tpot, consensus-ism. Finding your people and escaping the inner critic.

Era 16ish: Refract
Brent: “At the end of our one-month trial I remember telling my founder friends, ‘I found a right-hand guy — I feel force-amplified.’ His demeanor (almost always content and well-regulated) and way of listening (attuned, and detail oriented) meant I could focus on what I was good at and trust the rest of the company’s operations would be well-handled. I feel myself relaxing thinking about the effect Alex had on the company as I write this.” You set up the CRM, knowledge base, company rhythms. You maintained 50+ customer relationships over WhatsApp. Brent: “Every 1-2 months he’d send a high quality proposal on how he could upskill or apply his existing skills to new areas.”

Eras 17–18: Kensho → the Divine Period
Social anxiety vanished. Deep Okayness. The Leo re-emerged.

Eras 19–25: Music/YouTube, family therapy, EA Hotel, vignettes
Making things, repairing family, finding community. Conor: “He has an excellent approach to strategic planning and execution
 Alex has a very warm, clear, honest and straightforward way of communicating.” Simmo: “Openness in showing self. Deep desire to understand self and transform. Ownership of flaws. Responsive to feedback: grateful, non-defensive, and actually implements feedback
 You’re family now.”

Now (2026): First principles with Simmo
Wanting stable ground — not another framework but durable principles you can actually say no from.

What survived every pivot

Six people, across five years, who didn’t coordinate with each other, converge on the same picture. Here’s what shows up in every phase:

1. Metacognition — thinking about thinking, all the way up the stack.

This is the one that every single reference mentions independently.

  • The Alvea manager: “What I notice which is unique to you is how far ‘up the stack’ your self-improvement goes. Not just trying to get better at some particular subject matter or skill, but being deliberate about improving your approach and way of thinking.”
  • Ethan: “His ‘metacognitive emphasis’ — he spends a lot of effort thinking about how to improve and get better at reasoning about aspects of his own thinking and process beyond the object level.”
  • Brent: “Alex has thoroughly ‘learned how to learn.‘”
  • Simmo: “Deep desire to understand self and transform.”

This isn’t curiosity. It isn’t being a good student. It’s a specific and unusual thing: you compulsively improve the machinery of understanding itself. EA, post-rationalism, Kegan, A/B/U, the Socratic method, first principles — they’re not random pivots. They’re all the same impulse operating at different altitudes.

2. Crystallising chaos into legibility.

The most externally-validated superpower you have. Across every role, the pattern is identical: you walk into mess and make it structured, visual, and clear.

  • Ethan: “Discussed key company culture concepts with me, helped crystallise them and presented them in intuitive visual notes (some of which became references for the duration of the company).”
  • Ethan: “Conducted interviews with every person in the company and synthesised video snippets clustered by theme, which was one of the most information dense and informative things I watched while leading the company.”
  • The Alvea manager: “Impressive ability to crystallise, structure and organise information
 you blew my mind.”
  • Brent: “Our CRM, knowledge base, and company rhythms were all Alex-inspired and Alex-maintained.”
  • The scrapbook. The vignettes. The consensus-ism framework. A/B/U. “Scrunching.” The astrology note. This answer you’re reading right now exists because you asked an AI to do the thing you do to everything.

You said “COO not CEO.” Brent said “force-amplified.” What you actually are is the person who makes the invisible visible.

3. Warmth and connection — and the evidence is now overwhelming.

Six people. Across digital and in-person. Over five years. Unprompted, they all say the same thing:

  • Ethan: “Alex is a good person to work with. He’s friendly, thoughtful, funny and attentive. Particularly good at digital communication, making new folks feel quickly welcome and connected.”
  • Brent: “Alex maintained 50+ close customer relationships over WhatsApp.”
  • The Alvea manager: “Unusually good at connecting with people digitally
 person who everyone I’ve talked to enjoys working with
 one of my top choices for cultural role models.”
  • Conor: “Warm, clear, honest and straightforward. A joy to work with.”
  • Rob: “Made it a priority for the entire company to still work on professional growth and their connection with the team.”
  • Simmo: “You’re family now.”

The internal narrative says “I retreat, I’m an introvert, I hide in my room.” The external evidence — from every single person who’s worked with you — says you are unusually warm, connecting, and that people feel better for having worked with you. Both can be true. But the narrative needs updating.

4. High agency in undefined space — you thrive where there’s no playbook.

This one sharpened the most with the new references. Look at the pattern:

  • Alvea: hired for knowledge management, ended up redesigning company culture, comms norms, and operations. Ethan: “Very little specificity in what he was supposed to do. Time after time, found increasingly critical areas to own. Process entirely self-directed, most people would struggle with this.”
  • Refract: joined pre-launch, became the operations backbone. Brent: “In typical Alex fashion, I received a 3-page proposal on exactly how he could be an asset.”
  • Life itself: discovered post-rationalism, built a 315K-word scrapbook, created original frameworks (consensus-ism, scrunching/unscrunching), designed a community productivity group.

This is also why you leave when things get defined. It’s not fickleness. Your gift is specifically the moment of making sense — the space between chaos and legibility. Once something is legible, the interesting work is done. You pivot because your compass is pointing you toward the next thing that needs crystallising.

5. Fidelity to what’s alive — and swift, clean departure from what isn’t.

Consensus-ism is the philosophy. The biography is the evidence. EA wasn’t alive: left. Toronto wasn’t alive: left. The YouTube era was alive: committed fully. Family therapy is alive: still going. The astrology note captures it: Leo wants to shine when something’s real; triple fixed means full commitment when it is. “Scrunching” is your word for when you override this signal and force yourself into something dead.

6. You don’t need to earn your existence.

This is the background project of your adult life: disarming the part that says you’re boring, disappointing, and need to justify being here. Kensho showed you it was already done. The fetters work, IFS, family therapy, Deep Okayness — they’re all the same realisation approached from different angles. Simmo sees it: “Maybe the core is something like we’re sharing a journey: side-by-side, each of us making sense of how we’re fucked up and how that’s ok.”

The reason this one matters for first principles: when you lose hold of it, all five other threads contort into striving. The metacognition becomes “I need to be smarter.” The crystallisation becomes “I need to prove I’m valuable.” The connection becomes “I need to earn belonging.” When you hold it, everything relaxes into its natural shape.

Candidate first principles for stress-testing with Simmo

  1. My gift is metacognition and crystallisation — I walk into chaos and make it legible. I should seek contexts where that’s the job, and leave when the job is done.

  2. I thrive in undefined space — the pivots weren’t failures. They were my compass working correctly. I should stop apologising for them and start designing for them.

  3. Connection is a strength, not a project — six people over five years say I’m warm, connecting, and a joy to work with. The introvert narrative is outdated. I can update it.

  4. Trust the aliveness signal — when something’s dead, leave cleanly. When something’s alive, commit fully. The only error mode is scrunching: forcing myself to stay in something dead because I think I should.

  5. I don’t need to earn my existence — this is the one that, when I forget it, makes all the others toxic. When I remember it, they’re just
 me.

Appendix - original answer

Your life phases and what you cared about in each

Eras 1–12: Childhood → university → first job → living with girlfriend
Survival and escape. High-conflict household (age 6–18), retreating to your room, being the “sparkly golden son” who soothed your mum. Cared about: getting out, achieving (biotech startup, master’s), being in a relationship (connection via one person), doing the “right” things.

Eras 13–14: Breakup, EA, FTX-funded startup collapse
Rebuilding via ideology. EA gave you an external framework for what to care about. Cared about: impact, being useful, having a defensible reason for your choices. But as you later wrote — it was never alive, it was chosen, it came from outside.

Era 15: Asia — the turning point
Everything cracked open. Vipassana in Thailand, discovering tpot/post-rationalism through Simmo, consensus-ism emerging. Cared about: understanding your own mind for the first time, finding people who spoke your language, escaping the inner critic.

Eras 17–18: Life Itself community → Kensho → the Divine Period
The healing peak. Social anxiety vanished. Everything felt perfect and nothing needed fixing. Cared about: presence, Deep Okayness, the direct experience that Buddhism points to something real and empirical.

Eras 19–20: Toronto, post-Jhourney retreat
Following aliveness. The 5 Ms (Music, Martial Arts, Money, Merriment, Meditation), BJJ, falling in love with creating. Cared about: joy, embodiment, doing things because they’re alive — not because they’re justified.

Lol, how did it know about the 5 Ms, that’s a funny trip down memory lane.

Eras 21–25: Music/YouTube, family therapy, EA Hotel rounds, job hunting, travel
Integration and new tension. Making things (music, videos, vignettes, the scrapbook). Family therapy with your mum. Kegan 4.5 realisation that both rationalism and post-rationalism are partial stories. Cared about: creative expression, repairing family, learning to think rigorously, holding multiple frameworks without collapsing into one.

Now (2026): First principles with Simmo
Wanting stable ground. Not another framework to adopt, but durable principles you can reason from. Cared about: clarity, intellectual honesty, not approaching this as another seeking project.

Honestly, this is pretty amazing! And inspiring. Woo!

What survived every pivot

Five threads show up in literally every phase. These are your most reliable signals:

1. The drive to understand — yourself, others, reality.
This is the deepest one. It just keeps changing form: EA → post-rationalism → developmental psychology → Buddhist phenomenology → epistemology → Socratic method → first principles. The container changes every 6–18 months. The impulse never does. You’re not someone who wants to know things. You’re someone who wants to understand.

2. Making things that are both excellent and true.
Your 3w4 core. The biotech startup, the consensus-ism framework, the YouTube videos, the vignettes, this 315,000-word scrapbook. You can’t make something unless you genuinely mean it, and you can’t mean it unless you’ve put real craft in. “To be a boomer” isn’t just personal — it’s good writing. That matters to you. It always has.

3. The hunger for genuine connection — despite everything working against it.
Parentified child in a high-conflict household → isolation in your room → one-person relationships → social anxiety → Kensho dissolving it → community living → still hiding in your room. The desire is constant. The capacity fluctuates. But you keep trying: family therapy, authentic relating, moving to intentional communities, writing publicly. The pattern of retreating isn’t evidence that you don’t care about connection. It’s evidence of how much it costs you — and you keep paying it.

4. Fidelity to what’s alive (and swift departure from what isn’t).
Your “pivoting pretty damn quickly” isn’t flakiness — it’s a values signal. EA wasn’t alive: you left. The FTX startup wasn’t alive: you left1. Toronto wasn’t alive: you left. You have a ruthless internal compass for what has juice and what’s dead. Consensus-ism is basically the philosophy of trusting this signal. It survived because it describes the thing that was already operating.

5. Healing — specifically, becoming someone who doesn’t attack themselves.
From the inner critic inherited from your dad2, through consensus-ism as liberation from self-justification, through IFS/IPF/fetters work, through Kensho, through Deep Okayness (“the total banishment of self-loathing, the closure of the self as an attack surface”), through family therapy. This isn’t just one phase. This is the background project of your entire adult life: disarming the part of your mind that tells you you’re boring, disappointing, and need to earn your existence.

What this might mean for first principles

If I had to distill these five into candidate first principles for stress-testing with Simmo:

  • Understanding is intrinsically valuable to me — not as a means to impact, but as a way of being alive.
  • I make things, and the things I make must be honest — craft without authenticity is empty; authenticity without craft is indulgent.
  • Connection is not optional — even when it’s hard, even when I’d rather hide.
  • Trust the internal signal over the external framework — when something’s dead, leave; when something’s alive, follow it.
  • I don’t need to earn my existence — the healing project isn’t about fixing a broken person; it’s about recognising I was never broken.

The last one is the one I’d watch most carefully. It’s the thread that, when you lose sight of it, makes all the others contort into striving. And when you hold it, everything else relaxes into its natural shape.

Footnotes

  1. No dude, lol, the funder exploded. I would’ve stayed there for ages, it was so amazing ↩

  2. Bit of a hallucination here but yolo that’s ok ↩

Graph View

Backlinks